Talk:"Fel's Wrath"/@comment-108.18.25.110-20180510044220/@comment-108.18.25.110-20180514001016

My understanding is that Fel's Wrath is not the cause of the destruction of Corran Horn. The condition that destorys Corran is the Harpooned! effect. That is why I think that the second paragraph does not apply. Fel's Wrath has not destoryed the last enemy ship:

{If "Fel's Wrath" [has used his ability] and [destroys the last enemy ship], then [the match ends in a draw] as "winning the game" is checked at the end of the round.} = {IF "Fel's Wrath" [X=TRUE] AND "Fel's Wrath" [Y=TRUE] THEN [Z=TRUE]}

X= TRUE ("Fel's Wrath" has used his ability) Y=FALSE ("Fel's Wrath" destroys the last enemy ship) Z=FALSE

UNLESS, they are using the grammatically implication that X is the only part attached to "Fel's Wrath" while Y is independent of that condition (saying it doesn't matter how the last ship is destoryed, just that it happens).

So now, based on this thought/logic experiment, I'd conclude either interpretation is valid based on Rules As Written (RAW) and we can only guess as to Rules As Intended (RAI).

I NEED A JUDGE!!!