Talk:Moff Jerjerrod/@comment-87.112.140.177-20170930114425/@comment-454133-20170930163543

In one sense, yes the wording is slightly poor given the error on Jabba. However I seriously doubt someone would be able to do anything with that argument on the table since in all cases but Jabba's wording problem, cards refer only to the ship they're on unless explicitly stated otherwise. It's a real stretch, and people playing an actual game do not tend to bend over backwards with their opponent on wording interpretation (let alone TOs).

Thankfully Jabba's use is not contentious in practice -- it's a terrible and stupid mistake on FFG's part, but it's not causing venomous fights in the FFG forums like several cards have (and still do). The real fights are over cards which have multiple genuinely plausible interpretations that affect how they're played, and logic and discussion (and finally argument and name calling) cannot solve the dispute. For example, this thread. (btw please keep any Targeting Synchronizer rules discussion in that thread or otherwise on the FFG forums, as the topic is still venomous and I'd like to keep it on FFG's doorstep)