Talk:"Omega Ace"/@comment-187.234.139.221-20170719232053/@comment-454133-20170803044904

Anonymous user: Please take your discussion to the FFG forums. This isn't the place to call people idiots and cheaters just because they don't agree with you on the interpretation of a heavily-debated card. The FFG forums are the perfect place to get that hostility out of your system -- it's kind of their bread and butter. ;)

And if you think it's that obvious, then I think you haven't actually read the discussions in the forums and learned the reason for each side's interpretations. It's not decided yet, and it's not obvious. I recommend you do some detailed research; don't just jump to conclusions, nor believe anyone who tries to claim it's settled in their favor (watch for the followup post where they're corrected, it's often hilarious, and then soul-crushing as they start to fight it out and things get really personal).

I've read the discussions at length (see: soul-crushing), and they've led nowhere; it's not a problem we can resolve with language analysis, partially because FFG is just not consistent with their language. The forums can shout and analyze and insult all they want to, but here the stance is "we don't know, and we won't know until FFG clearly rules on it".

Also beware that it's also our policy here to treat people with respect, or at the bare minimum, distanced professionalism. Even if you disagree with them. If you're from the FFG forums you may not be used to that, but if you can't be professional, then the wiki is not the place to post.