Talk:Targeting Synchronizer/@comment-31119284-20170428233208/@comment-27221056-20170503071638

I'm not gonna go deeper into this discussion, as we have different viewpoints and neither of us are going to change this. And I really didn't want to discuss it (but ended up doing it anyway, (bullocks)).

I'm just baffled that a lot of people seems to think (FFG included) that the small Q&A entry in the end is enough to clarify this card. Some think, that because Colzet is mentioned in the entry, his ability works with TS. FFG keeps doing this with their wonky English. Our local, hot-shot TO, Vince Kingston, who also marshalls some of the major European tournaments, including Euros (so he has some influence on the rulings on controversial cards) keeps saying that FFG should playtest with actual TOs from the communities, to avoid these situations. I think he's discussing this with them right now, to figure out how it's going to.

His ruling, btw, is probably going to be the interpretation where primary attacks can be re-rolled as well.

The main reason I don't like this version, is because it's so obvious to me, that the card is intended for munitions and help lower ps ships to get them off. That would bring TIE Bombers back. I'm considering switching TS for Pattern Analyzer on Quickdraw in my current imp list, to help either Tomax Bren or the Scimitar Squadron Pilot shoot their Homing Missiles.

They should just make a list of what works with TS.