Talk:Snap Shot/@comment-87.242.135.99-20170831105701/@comment-454133-20170831165119

That is a point you can bring to the discussion on FFG, but the contemptuous nature of these discussions is exactly why I want to avoid doing that here. FFG's forums churn through countless arguments and buries them, but these posts last on the article for a long time (and each new post in the argument goes in the latest changes feed). Any time a card's interpretation is not clear cut because it's vague or has contradicting FAQ and rule entries, I'd prefer to dump the resulting argument and (almost inevitable) toxicity on FFG's doorstep, where it belongs. ;)

Not only to move the stink off the wiki, but also to hopefully put it on FFG's radar. Arguing here is unlikely to result in a FAQ because we at Wikia don't matter to FFG; I doubt any of their devs even acknowledge our existence or usefulness. But arguments on FFG's own forums usually lead to people e-mailing FFG with the question, which in 0.001% of cases has a one in six chance of being considered (and later rejected) for being included in a future FAQ.

It's still hopeless, but it's better than philisophically arguing to a stalemate and hurt feeling here. :/