Talk:Os-1 Arsenal Loadout/@comment-216.67.79.128-20171208192952/@comment-216.67.79.128-20171211060320

Every title card that explicitly states Attack(target lock) also explicitly states the same thing, only, in this case that wording would have been awkward. Or, at least, I can't see how they could have instead used Attack(target lock), even if they had meant something different. Seems much more borderline to me. The broader issue is why are some cards so restrictively interpreted while others, like, say, PTL for one example among many, have interpretations bent over backwards in mental gymnastics to delay stress until after the second action?