Talk:"Omega Leader"/@comment-150.214.75.142-20151026131021/@comment-212.93.55.34-20160316102022

Yes, I too thought it would be FAQ´d like that.

1. Someone posted an email where Frank ruled it contrary to the new FAQ. I brought it up as an example that they can get it wrong. IF it was a real answer from FFG.

2. Right call or a mistake. Not sure how wrong intepretations help more than house rules and decisions. Articles are full of rules mistakes too.

3. I have written several times, sometimes getting an answer, sometimes not. While it´s good that the rules are discussed, I don´t like the mentality that everybody should stop the debate just because someone posts an email claiming to be sent from FFG. Until official FAQ, good argumentation points about rules will do for me. Emails posted on forums without argumentation are useless.