Talk:Hotshot Co-Pilot/@comment-27666888-20161111120535/@comment-454133-20161111154239

I'm game.

Shoot 'em with a primary weapon, and they have to spend their focus token, even if they don't want to, and even if they roll no focuses. This could cripple their future attack/defense rolls, where they would have needed that token.

They shoot you, and they have to spend their focus token on the attack, even if doing so is useless to them. In rare cases you can make an attack hit you harder than it normally would (e.g. attacker would have saved the focus for defense or a 2nd attack, e.g. TIE/D), but generally that's a net win too.

Okay Ajones47, now what wordy madness awaits us? :D  I would assume it revolves around the missing "you are", e.g.:

"When you are attacking with a primary weapon..." and "When you are defending...".

I also want to cast doubt right now on any lasting status effects, e.g. you shoot them once and make them you target, and for the rest of the match they have to spend focus tokens. (they cease to be your target after the attack finishes). Likewise for only affecting counter-attacking foes, which would make this card too specific to be cost-effective.

That's all that springs to mind at first & 2nd glances.