Talk:Operations Specialist/@comment-31119284-20170222193014/@comment-454133-20170712032521

Anonymous: Yea, but you should equally avoid making such sweeping statements. ;)    Suffice it to say, the interpretation of Targeting Synchronizer has not been resolved, and if someone claims it has, they are sadly misinformed, or trying to push their side by feigning unanimous support.  There's still a lot of disagreement on exactly how it can be used, and fairly intense arguments on each side.   This is not the place for the discussion  (see why  here ) ; instead you should visit the FFG Forums and find out the current outstanding problems there.  Or take a much relaxed view on Targeting Synchronizer until FFG decides to explicitly address it in the FAQ.  Which they'll hopefully do someday.